top of page

Context: Tangible Abode

 

The properties of tangibility is repeatablility consistency origination and consequence

 

Consequential: conclusive: Consensus:

CCC///

 

This can be accounted as a form of radiation

 

The main difference with a lower abode is that the origin of the computation at the tangible level is not coming from your own center of computing.

 

In lower abodes, the external in which u participate is highly connected to your own ability to compute. 

 

If you are a program inside a computer depending on how u access subroutines, your main sequence code is able to modify external shells quiet naturaly. It is as if you can read a book where u have paraphrases that allow you to action a chosen behavior .the book is nearly a support that can be swapt for other narratives. The body that is inside the book is not entitled to be trapped in a narrative that he experiencing, all he has to do is swap books and experience another narrative. In tangible realit system, the body is highly dependent on the external shell, break a glass , u must swap it for another; 

 

Its as if there is a brain in the vat, the body inside teh brain can dream up anthing. But the brain in most cases cannot modify the physcis within his external shell

 

The abode that is above the current most outer body of the beings expressive limit eludes his ability to comprehend its simplicity. It is beyond its grasp. The emergence of a beings capability to derive complexcity may aid in its adventure to understand that which is higher. This is a growth that trancends its original rationality

Context: Contender Abode

 

The cotender abode, the one beneath the tangible construct is the contents of our figurative. 

All the narrations books stories n interactive systems n art. 

 

A relieve conducts abor within the release of its labor. A release is a loss of conclusivness,unless its gain ( simplified mechanics operation ) can be contained in the tangible compartments of the overarching abode* this constructs a sauvrage of the figurative that can be exchanged within vicinity. Each body is contained within its own vicinity, the exchange insures a partition of abor into a relation of labor or release

 

Interactive computation systems such as computers,video games within them are the representation of those compartments within the constraints of the tangible abode. The world inside the brain of the chicken are its experiential state: A form of release

 

A release may have great experiential satisfaction, this stimulation has a relationship with the loss of the conclusive abor, the being experiencing this satisfaction is still reliant on the body of its expressive limit, these are his vital wearabouts. 

 

The vitals of the being is dependent on the expressive limit of the abode he conducts in

 

The higher the abode the more conclusive is its operation. This labor concludes the beings vitals

​

​

Contact Me

Psychology report

​

The observation of a measurement.

 

A measurement is the posit of the exchange between a perturbed and the relevance of its unperturbed within a field of elapse of time.

 

This measurement and its observation ( and its impact). leaves no prolonged or evidential mark on relatable reality( reality we commonly converse about)

 

An example of measurable impact that could lead to this phenomenons concept is the idea that i can manoeuver or choose to action a certain motorocity and sample the actions response within others. The posit is in what the employ of its non manoeuvre (its unactioned counterpart ) would have resulted in.

Its simulteinous parallel.

 

-The impact is the differentiation between the 2 manoeuverd parallels within a frame of its consideration.

 

-A posit is the the relationship between the sampling and the inquiry of this inquisition

 

The phenomenons indexing is difficult to relate as its event isn’t ultimately exchangable as relatable realities observation is( our everyday causal conversational exchanges)

 

Why.

 

It is within an elapsed of time that is true to only the origin of the measurement (its vantage point) and true only if related to its considered. The impacts actual density overrides its recorded extrusion. It is the posit between the parallels that keep the impact in a clause.

 

The triviality of this event is why its index isn’t approachable

 

A person viewing such an individual is left perplexed as to what is the drive of his behaviour, it is unable to find what there is to relate based on the available external extensions. The counterpart is relating to his own feed with or without regards to the collectives contempt of the external concieve

 

The value of its triviality is acclaimed to the individual acquainted with his own feed due to the persons cataloging of the events catalyst.

The origin of the events have no relationship and are clearly unrelated yet their comparative opposites are evidential and actual. These are regrouped by the acclaimed as iterations in the form of symmetries that have an overarching parallel.

 

The considered are 2 distinctive samples of banal everyday events.*

Conclusion;

 

Externally a person is relatable to what he is perplexed by, it follows that an individual can derive or appreciate this posit’s internal, individual’s with relatable internals will appreciate their engagements.

Unrelated internals will be derived unperplexed and a person perplexed by his own engagements will develop self referential feeds.

*A persons extent is the conceived potency of a regarded predisposed triviality.

 

Is this a rewarding stimulation?

 

The acclaimed is self deriving unrelated regions of his immediate experience, the questioning of its apparent connected continuity gives the external triviality a sense of worth that deserves its unearthing. This person is then self stimulated by his own inference of the phenomenons logical approach.

He is motivated to be the animator of this phenomenon and its causal extrusion is its sense of reward.

 

The removal of the reward hinders what the individual considers as pleasurable as past extrusions are no longer worthwhile.

 

The priori of its inability to be demonstrated conduits its misunderstanding and cause of the psychiatric un-altriusm.


 

​

Damon Mangrum

Email: DamonMangrum@gmail.com

 

WhatsApp: +447570385275

© 2021 BlueThought. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page