top of page

Context: Womb

​

Womb

Density

Abode

​

A womb is a general Construct of attendence. (ea. Space opera)

A Density contains multiple abodes.

 

Realities one would consider magic are indeed other types of rulesets conducted by systems just as complex as the construct we reside in. The rulesets are within a constraint ressembling our own but its difference renders other types of physics which to us would be a keen to magical.

 

Difference between Cotender abodes:

Magic in contender abodes can usualy be captured within the contained organsation of our computational outputs within reality, such as video games inside a physical computer system, the freedom experienced through their stimulation when present within the cotender reality system inside the chickens brain is an emersed experienced data set of that rule set contained in the physical machine. The physical machien is built off the constraints of the tangible echelon where the machines physical processes are consequential to the constraints of that abode.

 

Radioactive rulesets containing magic:

Are uncontainable within the tangible level we occupy in our echelon of every day world. To be clear, in these other systems, you central computing center ( or brain) is not able to modify its external shell. This is because the main body carries that brain within those systems. So there for, the vital body within one of these reality Density's suffer consequence like our own vitals in our radio active abode. 

Example; Lord of the rings, starwars, Doom, Tyrian

 

These rulsets enable chemistry and radioactivity that inspire to the likes of what we portray in our figurative within the tangible abode such as movies and art, the level conveyed within its display cannot but a full description of that reality, it allows us to figurativley speak on its behalf.

 

In star artifact figurative, this is in the likes of another type of device. 

​

​

​

Contact Me

Psychology report

​

The observation of a measurement.

 

A measurement is the posit of the exchange between a perturbed and the relevance of its unperturbed within a field of elapse of time.

 

This measurement and its observation ( and its impact). leaves no prolonged or evidential mark on relatable reality( reality we commonly converse about)

 

An example of measurable impact that could lead to this phenomenons concept is the idea that i can manoeuver or choose to action a certain motorocity and sample the actions response within others. The posit is in what the employ of its non manoeuvre (its unactioned counterpart ) would have resulted in.

Its simulteinous parallel.

 

-The impact is the differentiation between the 2 manoeuverd parallels within a frame of its consideration.

 

-A posit is the the relationship between the sampling and the inquiry of this inquisition

 

The phenomenons indexing is difficult to relate as its event isn’t ultimately exchangable as relatable realities observation is( our everyday causal conversational exchanges)

 

Why.

 

It is within an elapsed of time that is true to only the origin of the measurement (its vantage point) and true only if related to its considered. The impacts actual density overrides its recorded extrusion. It is the posit between the parallels that keep the impact in a clause.

 

The triviality of this event is why its index isn’t approachable

 

A person viewing such an individual is left perplexed as to what is the drive of his behaviour, it is unable to find what there is to relate based on the available external extensions. The counterpart is relating to his own feed with or without regards to the collectives contempt of the external concieve

 

The value of its triviality is acclaimed to the individual acquainted with his own feed due to the persons cataloging of the events catalyst.

The origin of the events have no relationship and are clearly unrelated yet their comparative opposites are evidential and actual. These are regrouped by the acclaimed as iterations in the form of symmetries that have an overarching parallel.

 

The considered are 2 distinctive samples of banal everyday events.*

Conclusion;

 

Externally a person is relatable to what he is perplexed by, it follows that an individual can derive or appreciate this posit’s internal, individual’s with relatable internals will appreciate their engagements.

Unrelated internals will be derived unperplexed and a person perplexed by his own engagements will develop self referential feeds.

*A persons extent is the conceived potency of a regarded predisposed triviality.

 

Is this a rewarding stimulation?

 

The acclaimed is self deriving unrelated regions of his immediate experience, the questioning of its apparent connected continuity gives the external triviality a sense of worth that deserves its unearthing. This person is then self stimulated by his own inference of the phenomenons logical approach.

He is motivated to be the animator of this phenomenon and its causal extrusion is its sense of reward.

 

The removal of the reward hinders what the individual considers as pleasurable as past extrusions are no longer worthwhile.

 

The priori of its inability to be demonstrated conduits its misunderstanding and cause of the psychiatric un-altriusm.


 

​

Damon Mangrum

Email: DamonMangrum@gmail.com

 

WhatsApp: +447570385275

© 2021 BlueThought. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page